It would be nice to have those two additional options (--listen, --client) e.g.
Xpra_cmd.exe attach [ssh/tcp]: EMPTY --listen=[IP:PORT] (Waits for server ready msg, with optional timeout. IP is provided in case a machine has more than 1 active address, otherwise not needed)
xpra --start :XX --start-child=CMD --client=IP:PORT
Once server is initiated successfully, it sends a triggering tcp msg to the client containing USER@SERVER :XX to be used by the client to initiate ssh/tcp connection.
One useful option with client listen mode is continues listing, so that it exec clients once server msg received and keeps listing for more servers as they become ready, instead of launching clients manually for each application
Thank you,
As per this original mailing list thread: Xpra Client in Listen Mode Enquiry
I think it would be better, safer and more useful to simply reverse the connection so that the server connects to the client: no need for passing the user+host to connect to using a new magic message to trigger yet another connection. (with the inherent security risks every time - and new connections cannot traverse NAT back to the server).
The "listen" mode should probably be a new subcommand, rather than overloading "attach", ie:
xpra listen tcp:host:port
I really don't see much point at all in the listen via SSH option: if you can SSH to the client, you might as well start the client command via SSH, which is also much safer.
Pointers:
@adarrab: if you can take a look at the comments above and maybe even play with the code a little bit, I should be able to take a look at this for the next release
Sorry for the confusion, client doesn't listen through SSH, the [SSH/TCP] in the command line is to instruct the client to use [SSH/TCP] connection to the server (like attach [ssh/tcp]:....), once the server is ready. Listening is going to be always over tcp, since clients mostly do not run ssh server.
May be related / useful for #983 since vsock connections go from guest to host only. (AFAICT)
Edit: that was incorrect.
Milestone renamed
I don't have time for this.
Should be easy enough to implement.
There are security implications.. I don't think we want to resurrect #1660
Actually not that easy to implement, and no real need for it. Re-scheduling.
add listen mode for client
Helped by the refactoring from ticket:2125#comment:11, the patch above makes it possible for the client to wait for a connection on sockets specified using the usual --bind-tcp syntax.
See #2406 for generic client bind options.
working patch
The patch above works as long as one uses "socat" to join the server and client socket together:
xpra start --start="xterm" --bind-tcp=0.0.0.0:10000
xpra listen --bind-tcp=0.0.0.0:10001
socat TCP:localhost:10000 TCP:localhost:10001
I may still merge this just as a POC.
Merged in r23767. As of r23770, the client can also be told where to connect, instead of just expecting a server connection:
xpra listen --bind-tcp=0.0.0.0:10001
echo tcp://192.168.1.10:10000 | socat - TCP:localhost:10001
The client will print:
closing tcp socket 0.0.0.0:10001 connecting to tcp://192.168.1.10:10000
Then proceeds as if it had been started with attach tcp://192.168.1.10:10000.
Caveats:
(so if the connection fails at that point, the client will just exit)
Will follow up in #2412
@adarrab: does that work for you?
@adarrab: does that work for you?
First of all, many thanks for putting the time to implement this feature, really appreciated!
The very basic scenario does work, but you would need a port for each client, which makes it annoying in situations where firewall is restricted to limited number of opened ports (which is the case in many places). I was hoping to have the client in listening mode acts like a proxy server where it listens on a single port, and upon receiving a connection from xpra servers, it spawns clients and forward traffic to them.
At least this is what I ended up doing couple of years ago: a listener service on a specific port which spawns xpra clients (ssh connection & key authentication) to the ready server (once server is ready it sends a message similar to your approach). The only downfall to this is that the client takes up to 5 seconds to initialize and establish the ssh connection, despite disabling many of the features like speaker, microphone, tray ...etc. Your approach with tcp binding (when the client is ready in listening mode) it shows the received application almost instantaneous upon receiving the signal from the server.
I was hoping to have the client in listening mode acts like a proxy server where it listens on a single port, and upon receiving a connection from xpra servers, it spawns clients and forward traffic to them.
You should be able to achieve this with minimal code by spawning enough clients in advance in listen mode on a unix domain socket, then have a very simple tcp listener that dispatches to them.
This could be helped by #2406: by creating your unix domain sockets in a pre-defined location, the dispatcher could just use xpra info on them to know which ones are still free. (and potentially pre-spawn more as needed)
this ticket has been moved to: https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra/issues/1022