Opened 5 years ago
Last modified 4 months ago
#1172 assigned enhancement
untranslated keyboard
| Reported by: | Antoine Martin | Owned by: | Antoine Martin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | 5.0 |
| Component: | platforms | Version: | trunk |
| Keywords: | win32 osx shadow | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Follow up from #1099.
We should just pass the raw scancode to the server when we know it will be able to handle it. ie: win32 client with win32 server.
Also, expand r12399 to support more characters - generate the list? (deal non ascii characters too)
Think about better handling for keyboard layout mismatch between client and server, see ticket:1099#comment:10. We could keep multiple translation tables for each layout in use, then use the correct translation for the currently active keyboard layout.
See #1027, #817.
Change History (9)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by
| Status: | new → assigned |
|---|
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by
| Summary: | win32 and osx shadow servers untranslated keyboard → untranslated keyboard |
|---|
Initial support in r13328: I can attach an X11 client to an X11 server with --keyboard-layout=fr --keyboard-raw=yes and get a 'fr' layout even though my local keymap is set to 'gb'. The raw keycodes are used unmodified by the server.
Still TODO:
- extend this to shadow servers (win32 and osx)
- maybe support X11 server layout changes: re-detect updated settings
- maybe have an "auto" mode for enabling this when both ends are compatible? (ie: win32 shadow server with win32 client, X11 client with X11 server)
- maybe disable or remove the tray menu for cases where it won't be applicable
comment:5 Changed 3 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.0 → 2.5 |
|---|
Rather than extending the key packet with yet more data, we could use #1942 (new packet format).
comment:6 Changed 22 months ago by
| Milestone: | 2.5 → 4.0 |
|---|
comment:7 Changed 16 months ago by
comment:8 Changed 15 months ago by
| Milestone: | 4.0 → 5.0 |
|---|
comment:9 Changed 4 months ago by
this ticket has been moved to: https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra/issues/1172
copyleft 2010 - 2021
See also #1062, #1171.